I Never Knew You

 

"I never knew you"

Pride Is No Substitute For Truth

 

 

 

 

"Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?  And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity." - Matthew 7:22-23.

 

"I know that ye are Abraham's seed; but ye seek to kill me, because my word hath no place in you." - John 8:37.

 

"Take this book of the law, and put it in the side of the ark of the covenant of the Lord your God, that it may be there for a witness against thee." - Deuteronomy 31:26.

 

 

 

As the image above says: that is scariest phrase you will ever hear, IF you are unfortunate enough to hear it when the time comes.  “Not all are Israel, who are of Israel” in Romans 9:6.  Just because you claim Abraham’s seed does not mean you are grandfathered into heaven. 

 

Abraham’s “seed” was Christ Jesus as is explained in Galatians 3:16.  Yet the vain religions caught up in their manufactured entitlement continue to  deceive their congregations that “their church” offers the “restored Gospel”.   No one has yet seen Christ who is the only restoration.

 

And the “dealers” in deceit and false doctrine are ramping up their campaigns, because “the one” who will cause all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond to receive a mark”, will they bring forth.

 

The Lord’s “church” is not a corporation. God’s true church is not, and does not “own” God or lay claim to him through Rosaries, Prayer beads, Phylacteries, Endowment Ceremonies or secret passwords, rites or degrees.

 

I am tired of watching people get attacked for pointing out in scripture the truth of Christ, the truth of God and his testimony by insisting extra-biblical creations are “scripture” when they are not.

 

I will not shut up or shut down or back off from this.  Them that have the love of the truth cannot possibly reach everyone, but we can do our best to share the truth and cut them off that seek to recruit the unawares into deception.

 

 

 

The Mormon Inventions

 

I want to thank you for the time some of you took to post everything, your articles and links to your books for your religion (Mormons/LDS).  We have gone back and forth on the various points in scripture, sharing their intent from our different perspectives and belief systems.

 

The “Joseph Smith Translation” of the Bible was something I wasn’t even told about when my husband and I attended the services at different wards where we lived in South Carolina.

 

There is still the issue of Joseph Smith’s grifting background with the same “stone” he was written to have used to translate gold plates, and the Masonic origins of his family and himself.  If it weren’t for the things I had already researched years ago, I might have been persuaded that Joseph Smith was done dirty, and all his “prophesying” could have been corrupted.

 

I was sent to several links which had outlines with numerous other linked resources.  It was the busiest looking article I had ever seen, but I told this person I would read it.

 

I went to a linked outline on what one LDS member covered on the Joseph  Smith Translation/JST also known as the “Inspired Version Bible”/IVB and read down through it to this section, after realizing this could take me a year to go through.  If you find two or three misunderstandings/lies, it’s not going to get any better. Let’s start here:

 

Your Proposal:

 

"2024-01-25: Going over Giants in Genesis (JST 8) (KJV 6). The real Book Enoch has Elohim’s gospel in it, JST Genesis 6. Noah was perfect because he was sanctified not because no DNA problems."

 

The Scripture:

 

"These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God." - Genesis 6:9.

 

How can this mean anything else?  In context of the rest of this chapter what happened?

 

Sons of God came down (left their first estate, left their habitation, 2 Peter 2:4-5, Jude 1:6-7) and took as wives the daughters of men, who bore them children: those children "became mighty men which were of old, men of renown." in Genesis 6:4.  The seed of men was corrupted with them and they corrupted themselves with the seed of men.

 

There are two different “genes” spoken about here.  Something other than, or before the “seed of  men”. Genesis 1:26, Who was God talking to when he said “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness”: Sons of God.

 

David shares with us in Psalm, about the “other” seed:

 

"Their fruit shalt thou destroy from the earth, and their seed from among the children of men." - Psalm 21:10.

 

Their seed from the children of men: their seed, and the seed of men.

 

This is what the power of the blood of Christ is going to do. It is all about this!  We are corrupted with the seed of those angels that fell.  Again, in the prophecies of Daniel:

 

"And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay." - Daniel 2:43.

 

THEY shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: who are “THEY”?

 

Noah was sanctified BECAUSE he was perfect in his generations and walked with God.  This “wholeness” has a lot to do with our ability to connect to God, and this is exactly what the adversary wants to take from us.  Do a search on the VMat2 gene and the scientific papers on what they call “the God-Gene”. (“The seed is the Word of God” – Luke 8:10-11).

 

This “seed” has been the target of every adversary since the beginning! I can’t believe that some who profess to love Christ are attempting to disregard this agenda.

 

“2023-12-27: Showing how the JST gets Ezekiel 14:9 to work with the 10 divisions of Torah”. - What is the ten divisions of Torah? Are they referring to the ten commandments?  Or are they referring to the ten tribes that God took from Solomon?

In clicking on that link, I see that their "context" is missing in their assertations.  Does the Lord "deceive his people"?  So I quoted what they had:

 

Quote: "I was just saying I

00:00:26 don’t believe that God himself would

00:00:28 deceive people

00:00:30 so we were just wondering about that

00:00:33 translation well yeah I agree with you

00:00:35 uh

00:00:37 Yahweh would not and does not deceive

00:00:40 people for if he did how would he be a

00:00:44 just judge to judge them for something

00:00:47 he deceived them into just in the just

00:00:50 in the uh there’s a couple of problems

00:00:53 with"

 

I understand where they are getting this from: God doesn’t deceive anyone: WE are the ones who filter everything through our “idols”.  “I’m gonna be exactly what you wanna see” is a very astute statement . . . We deceive ourselves.  When God “sends”, we receive.  What we receive “through” (dirty or clean windows) is not God’s doing, it is ours.  Scripture on this, In context above verse nine concerning the "deceiving":

 

"Therefore speak unto them, and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord God; Every man of the house of Israel that setteth up his idols in his heart, and putteth the stumblingblock of his iniquity before his face, and cometh to the prophet; I the Lord will answer him that cometh according to the multitude of his idols;

 

5 That I may take the house of Israel in their own heart, because they are all estranged from me through their idols." - Ezekiel 14:4-5.

 

Their deception is already according to their idols, and he will answer them according to their idols for they refuse to repent of those idols.  There is no need to re-write this.  This is backed up in 2 Thessalonians 2 -

 

“And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.  And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:  That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness." - 2 Thessalonians 2:10-12.

 

I hope this gives the person who was concerned about God’s intent some peace on this.  There was no need for Joseph to rewrite a Bible on passages that were easily explained in other parts of the Bible.

 

The Section on Modalism:

 

Quote: "2023-11-14: Modalism in JST Genesis 22."

 

I had to read into what they meant, which meant clicking on that link.  Mormons don't believe that God is "three-in-one".

 

They use Genesis 22 but not in the King James Bible, but in the Joseph Smith Translation.  Again interpreting from a restatement.  Is it the same as the KJB Genesis 22?  This is where God provides a sacrifice after testing the faith of Abraham on the requiring of his son.

 

I don’t know how this aligns with the “modalism” unless this person is asserting that Abraham sacrificing Isaac is a foreshadowing of what God would provide in Jesus Christ.

 

The error in using that example is that Abraham is not God, and Isaac is not Jesus.  They represent this “act of love”.  It does not at all “prove” that God and Jesus are separate.  Jesus was the “Word made flesh”.  He didn’t start out as flesh, and he is no longer flesh but Spirit, on the throne.

 

The best illustration of this is the “Worldly tabernacle” and the “Heavenly tabernacle or the “Holiest of all” explanation in Hebrews 9.  First:

 

"For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one." - 1 John 5:7.

 

Jesus is the Word: he is ONE with the Father and the Holy Ghost.  This is the heavenly.  In verse 8, the “worldly” tabernacle, or, the “vessel/house/temple”:

 

1 John 5:8 describes "

“And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one."

 

You have the "heavenly tabernacle" (Christ, the Word who is God in John 1:1 and 1:14) and the "worldly" Tabernacle which Moses built; in which the "WITNESS against thee" is placed within the Ark in Deuteronomy 31:26. Three bear WITNESS in the earth; and Three bear RECORD in heaven.

 

We know this because Jesus IS the "Word [God] made flesh" and the Word is God.  Jesus was "pierced in his side" out of which blood and water poured (John 19:33-35) - That "bear witness in the earth". The “book of the law” placed in the side of the Ark is a WITNESS against thee (us).

 

To avoid taking hours going through each bullet point tit-for-tat, I decided to look more closely into the "Joseph Smith Translation" otherwise called the "Inspired Version of the Holy Scriptures" (as if the KJB wasn't?) and address the six (6) points of changes:

 

"Long additions that have little or no biblical parallel, such as the visions of Moses and Enoch, and the passage on Melchizedek

 

"Common-sense" changes (e.g., Genesis 6:6 "And it repented the Lord that he had made man" is revised in Moses 8:25 to read: "And it repented Noah, and his heart was pained that the Lord had made man". God, being perfect, needs no repentance.)

 

"Interpretive additions", often signaled by the phrase "or in other words," appending to a passage to clarify

 

"Harmonization", reconciled passages that seemed to conflict with other passages

 

"Not easily classifiable", frequently the meaning is changed, often idiosyncratically

 

Grammatical improvements, technical clarifications, and modernization of terms (by far the most common within the JST/IV)"

 

These points were taken from Philip Barlow's "Six basic types of changes" to the King James Bible.

 

- Long Additions: I'm not even going to address this.  The explanation "little or no biblical parallel" speaks for itself.

 

- Common Sense Changes: (Genesis 6:6 example) tells me that the person who decided this had no understanding of what the word "repented" means.  It means to turn back from or regret something you did, which in this case, was the creating of man, because the atrocities were so great.  To suggest that God wouldn't sorrow over, or have any feelings would deny the very characteristics he gave us when making us "in His Image". God feels.

 

Example: a genius, creative person comes up with an idea or a mathematical solution to benefit mankind, and another entity takes it and weaponizes it, and that creative person regrets it.  Same here.  The adversary corrupted God’s creation, not God.

 

- "Interpretive additions": "or in other words" suggests taking it upon one'self to paraphrase God's words in their own interpretation.  While many pastors do that when illustrating a verse in church; but it's not something that's okay to make "doctrine" or “cannon”.  It robs people of their own relationship hearing from the Holy Ghost themselves, what God want's them to get out of that passage.  This is why we are told in John 14:26:

 

"the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you."

 

Inspiration comes from the Holy Ghost, IN Christ's NAME.  It's not something man can give another man by saying "This is what I say it means".

 

- Harmonization": No passage in the Bible conflicts with another passage.  Every verse is explained or interpreted by another verse in the Bible.  It is whole, complete the way it is.  It takes prayer for understanding, discernment and STUDY because you WILL find those verses, when God deems that time for that revealing to you, according to your growth in faith.

 

I am still finding scripture that I've read a hundred times, that suddenly the meaning of it comes to me, and I can verify it in another verse that I read a while back that reconciles the "conflict".  The whole Bible in context is not something you can get in a couple of years.  It needs not be re-written, you can lock yourself right out of understanding.

 

- "Not easily Classifiable": It says "frequently the meaning is changed".  There is no need for this.  That is corrupting the scripture.

 

- "Grammatical Improvements": it says "technical clarifications, and modernization of terms".  I don't know what he means by "technical clarifications".  Thee's, thou's and Ye's notwithstanding, I kind of like the power in those expressions.  Some people may find it harder to read, but I can picture God talking like that, but in my dreams, he spoke without the poetry.  I’m used to the Edwardian pronouns.

 

There are so many "translations" to the English versions of the Bible, one has to wonder why so many attempts to re-write it.

 

This is probably my main sticking point about the Mormon claims.  In Nephi 29:3-4 concerning the Bible:

 

"And because my words shall hiss forth—many of the Gentiles shall say: A Bible! A Bible! We have got a Bible, and there cannot be any more Bible.

 

4 But thus saith the Lord God: O fools, they shall have a Bible; and it shall proceed forth from the Jews, mine ancient covenant people. And what thank they the Jews for the Bible which they receive from them? Yea, what do the Gentiles mean? Do they remember the travails, and the labors, and the pains of the Jews, and their diligence unto me, in bringing forth salvation unto the Gentiles?

 

5 O ye Gentiles, have ye remembered the Jews, mine ancient covenant people? Nay; but ye have cursed them, and have hated them, and have not sought to recover them. But behold, I will return all these things upon your own heads; for I the Lord have not forgotten my people.

 

6 Thou fool, that shall say: A Bible, we have got a Bible, and we need no more Bible. Have ye obtained a Bible save it were by the Jews?"

 

While redundant, I disagree that “Jews” wrote the Bible.  Some were, but there is no claim for that in the Bible.  If they had written the Bible, they would not have killed Jesus.  And this part of Nephi is rather transparent in the “persecution” theme when the Gospels tell you exactly who the persecutors and the oppressors are.

 

Not only that, but “Jesus” is not mentioned one time in this rant.  Who brings salvation to anybody?  It’s Jesus!  Where is he mentioned in here?

 

This isn’t about “the Jews”, it is about “Christ”, which is “The Word” which is the “One word that fulfills all the law”.

 

The Jews in the Jewish religion, back then and today, hate Jesus and hate Christians.  Not all of them individually, but their religion teaches them this.

 

Jesus names them.  Paul names them.  It doesn’t mention Islam, it doesn’t even mention Arabs.  It is the Jews and the religion of the Jews that have “persecuted the church of God and wasted it” (Galatians 1:13-14).

 

“Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:” – Romans 9:6.

 

 “I know that ye are Abraham's seed; but ye seek to kill me, because my word hath no place in you.” – John 8:37.

 

There is also this: what disturbs most Christians I have spoken to about this subject is the claimed extant value of the Book of Mormon.  Certain words date it, like “Bible”:

 

"The word Bible itself is simply a transliteration of the Greek word bíblos (βίβλος), meaning "book." So the Bible is, quite simply, The Book." . . .

 

"It is interesting that the Bible never refers to itself as "the Bible." So when did people start calling these sacred writings by the word Bible? Again, the Bible is not really a book, but a collection of books. Yet, even the New Testament writers seemed to understand that the things being written about Jesus were to be considered part of Scripture." – Biblestudy tools.com

 

Biblio/Biblos = “The Book”.   The LDS claims that their “Book of Mormon” actually predates the Bible, which is ridiculous, otherwise, the plagiarism of Isaiah, and the mention of “Bible” as the scriptures (while denouncing it as incomplete) would not appear in the Nephi story.

 

The earliest use of the word "Bible" to describe the combined scriptures is around 4th century or 388 CE. (Source, Wikipedia on Bible Entymology).  “Bible” comes from the Greek "Biblio" and/or the Latin Biblia meaning "The Book” or "Books".

 

The “Book of Mormon”, and indeed the mention in “Nephi 29:3-6” of “Bible” according to the Mormons, was supposed to be an ancient book that an angel named “Moroni” gave to Joseph Smith to translate which were on “gold plates”.

 

What became the “Holy Bible” was, before the Aleppo Codex, a collection of scriptures from the prophets, handed down the tribes of Israel.  The use of the word “Bible” as the compiled collection today does not predate Moroni.  As a matter of fact, the Moroni story claims the same timing as “earliest use of the word Bible” for the scriptures.

 

If we consider what "The Books" actually are:

 

"And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works." - Revelation 20:12.

 

These “books” are within us.  Just as David describes in Psalm 139:14-16.

 

 

Moroni, Mormon, Men

 

Earlier in my struggle with this organization, it was explained to me that  the name “Mormon” meant “more good”.  It was Egyptian in origin according to the Joseph Smith histories on where the word came from (see Name Origin).

 

I had done my own etymological search on “mor + mon”.

 

“mor”: mor "great" – first found here, then on “more” - Etymonline.com.

 

“mon: from Latin mons (plural montes) "mountain" (from PIE root *men- (2) "to project")” – Etymonline.com.

 

 So I went to “men” (man).

 

“men: Proto-Indo-European root meaning "to think," with derivatives referring to qualities and states of mind or thought.  It is the hypothetical source of/evidence for its existence is provided by: Sanskrit manas- "mind, spirit," matih "thought,"” - Etymonline.com.

So “mor + mon” would mean something akin to “great + mountain” or “great + men/mind”.

 

“great men” scripturally reminded me of Genesis 6:2-5 and Revelation 18:23. 

 

There are also “great men” who were of the  prophets of the Bible and strong houses of Israel.  How do we know which?  By their fruits.  In 2 Peter 2:1-4 and Jude 1:3-5.  “bringing in damnable heresies”, “who were before of old, ordained to this condemnation”, “False prophets”, “false teachers” who “crept in unawares”.  Why does Jesus and Paul still bring up “Egypt” centuries after that exodus?

 

Because most are still in bondage to it.  Some religions are based on, and whose goals are to pull them back into bondage: Acts 7:6, and Galatians:

 

“And that because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage:” – Galatians 2:4.

 

And Galatians 4:24-26 gender to “bondage” which the Jerusalem that now is, is under with her children – And there is that word “gender” again.

 

Everything that has happened, IS happening and WILL happen is about "The Word": What it is, what happened to it within us, and how God restores it through Christ.

 

There are no ceremonies, no rituals, no race of people and no "religion" that corners the market on this.  It's not about religion.  And any religious organization claiming that a "prophet" brought or wrote, "the restored Gospel" is not about Christ; but about their religion or the power they covet through it and for it.  Period.

 

The Mormon church is exactly what Christ tells us not to be: they are secretive, they use ritual, “secret passwords”, they are prideful, they lie and flatter: the organization is wealthy: they take from the people and gather unto themselves.  They are exactly what Egypt was, before the 400 years of hard bondage in Moses’ time.

 

They promote the Jewish fables and the law over teachings of Christ.  They align with the Jews, as promoted in that Nephi 29 chapter over Christ to the point that they baptize their people in a “sea” sitting atop twelve sculptures of oxen.

 

That is Solomon’s temple (1 Kings 7:25), not Christ’s! Romans 1:25, Psalm 106:19-20.  We know what happened to Solomon’s Temple (1 Kings 11:3-5; 2 Kings 25:9)!

 

In this narration (biblical narrative), it highlights several scriptures in the Bible concerning the building, the corrupting and the destruction of the Temple of Solomon:

 

“Hamath” (a city in Syria. Hamas? 1 Kings 8:65, 2 Chronicles 7:8).  Such a dirty word in today’s current events.

 

“Aram-Damascus” – (2 Kings 16:6-8) This is where Rezin of Syria recovered Elath to Syria and drove out the Jews; where the first mention of the word “Jew” as an identity appears in the Bible.

 

“Sennecherib” – (2 Kings 18:15-16) the “Cherub” that “sinned” (Ezekiel 28:16) .  Pay attention to this. “You will know them by their fruits”.

 

Construction Of Solomon’s Temple

 

Ziv – Link leads to “Iyar” (which I thought was Lyar until I saw it in a different font). Solomon began building the temple in the eighth month of the civil year and second month of the Ecclesiastical year. That would be today October (civil) or March/April (spiritual calendar).

 

Bul – Temple is completed, ironically the opposite of Ziv (is the eighth month civil, and second month spiritual calendar month), which today is called “Cheshvan/Marcheshvan”.  The month of “Bul” after a seven year project to completion: See Daniel chapter four concerning Nebuchadnezzar’s “seven times” living as the beast, as an “ox eating grass” (Psalm 106:19-20).  These two terms appear in 1 Kings 6:37-38.

 

Reminder: (John 2:21 and 1 Corinthians 6:19); Jesus revealed “the temple of his body”.  Paul revealed our bodies “are the temples of the Holy Ghost”, which we have of God.  To continue:

 

Tyrians – The Tyrians were the one’s who actually built the temple, according to the plan God sent David for Solomon to build. But Solomon didn’t labor, the Tyrians did the actual labor.

 

Solomon hired Hiram (King Hiram) of Tyre/Tyrus, Lebanon to oversee the labor.  He is described as “a skilled craftsman” a “stone mason”.

 

The king of Tyre is also mentioned in Ezekiel 28, in context:

 

“Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire.” – Ezekiel 28:12-15.

 

And in Isaiah:

 

“Thy pomp is brought down to the grave, and the noise of thy viols: the worm is spread under thee, and the worms cover thee.  How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!

” – Isaiah 14:8-15.

 

You see where the Lord is taking us in this?

 

That isn’t all:  In that same paragraph on the “construction” of the temple: it also mentioned in relation to Hiram that the “Stonemasons” (which they capitalize) were from Gebal (Byblos in parenthesis).  Byblos is linked, but Gebal is not. These cut the stones of the temple.

 

Gebal is mentioned in two verses in the Old Testament: Psalm 83:7 and Ezekiel 27:9.  I posted the links in context of the verses mentioning Tyre/Tyrus and the merchants that traded in gold, silver, brass, persons of men and vessels. (Selling the souls of men, Revelation 18:11-13).

 

Byblos does not appear in the Bible itself; however Gobel and Gebal does.  The etymology also leads to the word “Bible”, meaning “The Book”.

 

"The English word "Bible", therefore, ultimately derives from the Greek name of the city, Βύβλος ('Βύblos / Byblos'), a Greek mumbo-jumble of גְּבָל ('Gāḇal / Gəbal Gobâl'..., that is, 'Gebal' or 'Jebel'), which shares the same root as גְּבוּל ('Gəḇūl / Gābūl, that is 'Gebul' or 'Jabul'), as they're derivatives of ג־ב־ל ('g-ḇ-l' / 'g-b-l' / 'g-v-l'), which means 'twist as a rope', '(be a, set) border' or 'bound(aria)'" – Source, Byblos etymology.

 

“twist as a rope” – DNA (Gabal, Cabal, Cabbala):  His substance David talks about being “made” in Psalm 139:14-16.

 

You have Judah, the lawgiver who “built Elath in 2 Kings 14:21-24 and “restored it to Judah”.  Two chapters later in 2 Kings 16:6 you have Judah at war with Israel and Syria; as King Rezin of Syria is driving the Jews (first mention of them in the Bible) from “Elath” and “recovered Elath to Syria” where “they remain unto this day”. (See Isaiah 17:3).

 

The Jews come back down into the remnant of Judah, when they learn that King Nebuchadnezzar spared a remnant of them.  Why?  Because Judah is the lawgiver.  So who were the Jews before they were Judah?

 

Remember, Sennecherib, Eliakim and his discussion with Rabshakeh over the “Syrian language” over the “language of the Jews” (2 Kings 18:26) happened after the fall of Solomon.

 

Where do the Mormons fit in here?

 

So “mor + mon” would mean something akin to “great + mountain” or “great + men/mind”.

 

“great men” scripturally reminded me of Genesis 6:2-5 and Revelation 18:23. 

 

They are tied to the very “stonemasons” from “Tyre”; the “craftsmen” Hiram and their “traditions” of re-arranging the structure (letters) of the temple.

 

Jesus “Knew letters” (John 7:15): the Jews in the Synagogue were shocked, because he wasn’t one of them: he was never taught the letters of the language within us. 

 

Jesus was “God in the flesh” (1 Tim. 3:16).  He not only knew what was written in us, he know what was written in THEM.

 

The Mormon religion was “constructed” after the death of William Morgan: a “Freemason” who went rogue and was planning to expose them.

 

William Morgan’s widow, Lucinda Pendelton Morgan somehow ended up being Joseph’s Smith’s third “plural wife” a year after the Freemasons went quiet and the “Mormon” religion was conceived (within months of each event). There have been some additions to the section on Lucinda since I looked at it ten years ago, that now shed doubt, but she was sealed to him.

 

The “Endowment Ceremony”, which my husband was being groomed for, is a renovation of the Freemason degree ceremony, admitted by the fellow who was helping my husband prepare for it.

 

I suffered many things trying to expose this religion and it’s ties the to false Jews deception of the beast they will call “Messiah”.  Most of those things exposed were removed by Google when they cut off my account and blog.  I still have them and have reposted many concerning the LDS here at the bottom of the article with summary.

 

I know the things God revealed to me, and what I'm supposed to share about them.  I don't belong to a religious organization because all the various houses of religion that I have visited have revealed to me that in some degree, they have laid claim on the ownership of God.  And I will not entertain these vanities in religions any longer.

 

We are called to “earnestly contend for the faith” (Jude 1:3), not a “religion”.

 

We are called to “have no fellowship with the works of darkness, but reprove them” (Ephesians 5:11-12).  I would rather that feelings be hurt, and not souls in the speaking of the truth.

 

There is movement in the tunnels of the deception.  Oh, and one more thing:

 

On the construction section of the article on Solomon’s temple, it refers to the event in 1 Kings 9:12-14, citing:

 

“After the Temple and palace (taking an additional 13 years) is completed, Solomon hands over twenty cities in the northwestern Galilee near Tyre as a repayment to Hiram.^[24] Hiram was not pleased with the gift, however, and asks "what are these towns that you have given me, my brother?". Hiram then calls them "the land of Cabul (Kabul)"

 

Cabul/Cabal – And Hiram sent King Solomon “threescore talents of gold”.  That is “six hundred and six” talents less than Solomon received in taxes in a year.  1 Kings 10:14 & Revelation 13:18.

Pride, religion, elitism, working in the dark against your fellow man while claiming piety: Read it again.  Is it really worth it?

 

"Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?  And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity." - Matthew 7:22-23.