"I never knew you"
Pride Is No Substitute For Truth
"Many
will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name?
and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful
works? And then will I profess unto
them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity."
- Matthew 7:22-23.
"I
know that ye are Abraham's seed; but ye seek to kill me, because my
word hath no place in you." - John 8:37.
"Take
this book of the law, and put it in the side of the ark of the
covenant of the Lord your God, that it may be there for a witness
against thee." - Deuteronomy 31:26.
As the image
above says: that is scariest phrase you will ever hear, IF you are unfortunate
enough to hear it when the time comes. “Not all are Israel, who are of Israel” in Romans 9:6.
Just because you claim Abraham’s seed does not mean you are
grandfathered into heaven.
Abraham’s
“seed” was Christ Jesus as is explained in Galatians 3:16.
Yet the vain religions caught up in their manufactured entitlement
continue to deceive their congregations
that “their church” offers the “restored Gospel”. No one
has yet seen Christ who is the only restoration.
And the
“dealers” in deceit and false doctrine are ramping up their campaigns, because
“the one” who will cause all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and
bond to receive a mark”, will they bring forth.
The Lord’s
“church” is not a corporation. God’s true church is not, and does not “own” God
or lay claim to him through Rosaries, Prayer beads, Phylacteries, Endowment
Ceremonies or secret passwords, rites or degrees.
I am tired
of watching people get attacked for pointing out in scripture the truth of
Christ, the truth of God and his testimony by insisting extra-biblical creations
are “scripture” when they are not.
I will not
shut up or shut down or back off from this.
Them that have the love of the truth cannot possibly reach everyone, but
we can do our best to share the truth and cut them off that seek to recruit the
unawares into deception.
The Mormon Inventions
I want to
thank you for the time some of you took to post everything, your articles and
links to your books for your religion (Mormons/LDS). We have gone back and forth on the various
points in scripture, sharing their intent from our different perspectives and belief
systems.
The “Joseph
Smith Translation” of the Bible was something I wasn’t even told about when my
husband and I attended the services at different wards where we lived in South
Carolina.
There is
still the issue of Joseph Smith’s grifting background with the same “stone” he
was written to have used to translate gold plates, and the Masonic origins of
his family and himself. If it weren’t
for the things I had already researched years ago, I might have been persuaded
that Joseph Smith was done dirty, and all his “prophesying” could have been
corrupted.
I was sent
to several links which had outlines with numerous other linked resources. It was the busiest looking article I had ever
seen, but I told this person I would read it.
I went to a
linked outline on what one LDS member covered on the Joseph Smith Translation/JST also known as the
“Inspired Version Bible”/IVB and read down through it to this section, after
realizing this could take me a year to go through. If you find two or three misunderstandings/lies,
it’s not going to get any better. Let’s start here:
Your Proposal:
"2024-01-25:
Going over Giants in Genesis (JST 8) (KJV 6). The real Book Enoch has Elohim’s
gospel in it, JST Genesis 6. Noah was perfect because he was sanctified not
because no DNA problems."
The Scripture:
"These
are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his
generations, and Noah walked with God." - Genesis 6:9.
How can this
mean anything else? In context of the
rest of this chapter what happened?
Sons of God
came down (left their first estate, left their habitation, 2 Peter 2:4-5, Jude 1:6-7) and took as wives the daughters of
men, who bore them children: those children "became
mighty men which were of old, men of renown." in Genesis 6:4.
The seed of men was corrupted with them and they corrupted themselves
with the seed of men.
There are
two different “genes” spoken about here.
Something other than, or before the “seed of men”. Genesis 1:26, Who was God talking to when he said
“Let us make man in our image, after our
likeness”: Sons of God.
David shares
with us in Psalm, about the “other” seed:
"Their fruit shalt thou destroy from the earth, and their
seed from among the children of men." - Psalm 21:10.
Their seed
from the children of men: their seed, and the seed of men.
This is what
the power of the blood of Christ is going to do. It is all about this! We are corrupted with the seed of those
angels that fell. Again, in the
prophecies of Daniel:
"And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall
mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to
another, even as iron is not mixed with clay." - Daniel 2:43.
THEY shall
mingle themselves with the seed of men: who are “THEY”?
Noah was
sanctified BECAUSE he was perfect in his
generations and walked with
God. This “wholeness” has
a lot to do with our ability to connect to God, and this is exactly what the
adversary wants to take from us. Do a
search on the VMat2 gene and the scientific papers on what
they call “the God-Gene”. (“The
seed is the Word of God” – Luke 8:10-11).
This “seed”
has been the target of every adversary since the beginning! I can’t believe
that some who profess to love Christ are attempting to disregard this agenda.
“2023-12-27:
Showing how the JST gets Ezekiel 14:9 to work with the 10 divisions of Torah”.
- What is the ten divisions of Torah? Are they referring to the ten
commandments? Or are they referring to
the ten tribes that God took from Solomon?
In clicking
on that link, I see that their "context" is missing in their
assertations. Does the Lord
"deceive his people"? So I
quoted what they had:
Quote:
"I was just saying I
00:00:26 don’t
believe that God himself would
00:00:28
deceive people
00:00:30 so
we were just wondering about that
00:00:33
translation well yeah I agree with you
00:00:35 uh
00:00:37
Yahweh would not and does not deceive
00:00:40
people for if he did how would he be a
00:00:44
just judge to judge them for something
00:00:47 he
deceived them into just in the just
00:00:50 in
the uh there’s a couple of problems
00:00:53
with"
I understand
where they are getting this from: God doesn’t deceive anyone: WE are the ones
who filter everything through our “idols”.
“I’m
gonna be exactly what you wanna see” is a very astute statement . .
. We deceive ourselves. When God “sends”,
we receive. What we receive “through”
(dirty or clean windows) is not God’s doing, it is ours. Scripture on this, In context above verse
nine concerning the "deceiving":
"Therefore speak unto them, and say unto them, Thus saith
the Lord God; Every man of the house of Israel that setteth up his idols in his
heart, and putteth the stumblingblock of his iniquity before his face, and
cometh to the prophet; I the Lord will answer him that cometh according
to the multitude of his idols;
5 That I may take the house of Israel in their own heart,
because they are all estranged from me through their idols." - Ezekiel 14:4-5.
Their
deception is already according to their idols, and he will answer them
according to their idols for they refuse to repent of those idols. There is no need to re-write this. This is backed up in 2 Thessalonians 2 -
“And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them
that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they
might be saved. And for this cause
God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed
not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness." - 2 Thessalonians 2:10-12.
I hope this
gives the person who was concerned about God’s intent some peace on this. There was no need for Joseph to rewrite a
Bible on passages that were easily explained in other parts of the Bible.
The
Section on Modalism:
Quote:
"2023-11-14: Modalism in JST Genesis 22."
I had to
read into what they meant, which meant clicking on that link. Mormons don't believe that God is
"three-in-one".
They use
Genesis 22 but not in the King James Bible, but in the Joseph Smith Translation. Again interpreting from a restatement. Is it the same as the KJB Genesis
22? This is where God
provides a sacrifice after testing the faith of Abraham on the requiring of his
son.
I don’t know
how this aligns with the “modalism” unless this person is asserting that
Abraham sacrificing Isaac is a foreshadowing of what God would provide in Jesus
Christ.
The error in
using that example is that Abraham is not God, and Isaac is not Jesus. They represent this “act of love”. It does not at all “prove” that God and Jesus
are separate. Jesus was the “Word made
flesh”. He didn’t start out as flesh,
and he is no longer flesh but Spirit, on the throne.
The best illustration
of this is the “Worldly tabernacle” and the “Heavenly tabernacle or the
“Holiest of all” explanation in Hebrews 9.
First:
"For
there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word,
and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one." - 1 John 5:7.
Jesus is the
Word: he is ONE with the Father and the Holy Ghost. This is the heavenly. In verse 8, the “worldly” tabernacle, or, the
“vessel/house/temple”:
1 John 5:8 describes "
“And there are three that bear witness in earth,
the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one."
You have the
"heavenly tabernacle" (Christ, the Word who is God in John 1:1 and 1:14) and the "worldly"
Tabernacle which Moses built; in which the "WITNESS against thee" is
placed within the Ark in Deuteronomy 31:26. Three bear WITNESS in the earth; and Three bear RECORD in heaven.
We know this
because Jesus IS the "Word [God] made flesh" and the Word is God. Jesus was "pierced in his side" out
of which blood and water poured (John 19:33-35) - That "bear witness in the
earth". The “book of the law” placed in the side of the Ark is a WITNESS
against thee (us).
To avoid
taking hours going through each bullet point tit-for-tat, I decided to look
more closely into the "Joseph Smith Translation" otherwise called the
"Inspired Version of the Holy Scriptures" (as if the KJB wasn't?) and
address the six (6) points of changes:
"Long additions that have little
or no biblical parallel, such as the visions of Moses and Enoch, and the
passage on Melchizedek
"Common-sense" changes
(e.g., Genesis 6:6 "And it repented the Lord that he had made
man" is revised in Moses 8:25 to read: "And it repented Noah,
and his heart was pained that the Lord had made man". God, being
perfect, needs no repentance.)
"Interpretive additions", often
signaled by the phrase "or in other words," appending to a passage to
clarify
"Harmonization", reconciled
passages that seemed to conflict with other passages
"Not easily classifiable", frequently
the meaning is changed, often idiosyncratically
Grammatical improvements, technical clarifications, and modernization of terms (by
far the most common within the JST/IV)"
These points
were taken from Philip Barlow's "Six basic types of
changes" to the King James Bible.
- Long Additions: I'm not even going to address
this. The explanation "little
or no biblical parallel" speaks for itself.
- Common
Sense Changes: (Genesis
6:6 example) tells me that the person who decided this had no understanding of
what the word "repented" means.
It means to turn back from or regret something you did, which in this
case, was the creating of man, because the atrocities were so great. To suggest that God wouldn't sorrow over, or
have any feelings would deny the very characteristics he gave us when making us
"in His Image". God feels.
Example: a
genius, creative person comes up with an idea or a mathematical solution to
benefit mankind, and another entity takes it and weaponizes it, and that
creative person regrets it. Same
here. The adversary corrupted God’s
creation, not God.
- "Interpretive
additions":
"or in other words" suggests taking it
upon one'self to paraphrase God's words in their own interpretation. While many pastors do that when illustrating
a verse in church; but it's not something that's okay to make
"doctrine" or “cannon”. It
robs people of their own relationship hearing from the Holy Ghost themselves, what
God want's them to get out of that passage.
This is why we are told in John 14:26:
"the Comforter,
which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he
shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance,
whatsoever I have said unto you."
Inspiration
comes from the Holy Ghost, IN Christ's NAME.
It's not something man can give another man by saying "This is
what I say it means".
- Harmonization": No passage in the Bible
conflicts with another passage. Every
verse is explained or interpreted by another verse in the Bible. It is whole, complete the way it is. It takes prayer for understanding,
discernment and STUDY because you WILL find those verses, when God deems that
time for that revealing to you, according to your growth in faith.
I am still
finding scripture that I've read a hundred times, that suddenly the meaning of
it comes to me, and I can verify it in another verse that I read a while back
that reconciles the "conflict".
The whole Bible in context is not something you can get in a couple of
years. It needs not be re-written, you
can lock yourself right out of understanding.
- "Not
easily Classifiable":
It says "frequently the meaning is changed". There is no need for this. That is corrupting the scripture.
- "Grammatical
Improvements":
it says "technical clarifications, and modernization of terms". I don't know what he means by "technical
clarifications". Thee's, thou's and
Ye's notwithstanding, I kind of like the power in those expressions. Some people may find it harder to read, but I
can picture God talking like that, but in my dreams, he spoke without the
poetry. I’m used to the Edwardian
pronouns.
There are so
many "translations" to the English versions of the Bible, one has to
wonder why so many attempts to re-write it.
This is
probably my main sticking point about the Mormon claims. In Nephi 29:3-4 concerning the Bible:
"And because my words shall hiss
forth—many of the Gentiles shall say: A Bible! A Bible! We have got a Bible,
and there cannot be any more Bible.
4 But thus saith the Lord God: O fools,
they shall have a Bible; and it shall proceed forth from the Jews, mine ancient
covenant people. And what thank they the Jews for the Bible which they receive
from them? Yea, what do the Gentiles mean? Do they remember the travails, and
the labors, and the pains of the Jews, and their diligence unto me, in bringing
forth salvation unto the Gentiles?
5 O ye Gentiles, have ye remembered the
Jews, mine ancient covenant people? Nay; but ye have cursed them, and have
hated them, and have not sought to recover them. But behold, I will return all
these things upon your own heads; for I the Lord have not forgotten my people.
6 Thou fool, that shall say: A Bible, we
have got a Bible, and we need no more Bible. Have ye obtained a Bible save it
were by the Jews?"
While
redundant, I disagree that “Jews” wrote the Bible. Some were, but there is no claim for that in
the Bible. If they had written the
Bible, they would not have killed Jesus.
And this part of Nephi is rather transparent in the “persecution” theme
when the Gospels tell you exactly who the persecutors and the oppressors are.
Not only
that, but “Jesus” is not mentioned one time in this rant. Who brings salvation to anybody? It’s Jesus!
Where is he mentioned in here?
This isn’t
about “the Jews”, it is about “Christ”, which is “The Word” which is the “One
word that fulfills all the law”.
The Jews in
the Jewish religion, back then and today, hate Jesus and hate Christians. Not all of them individually, but their
religion teaches them this.
Jesus names
them. Paul names them. It doesn’t mention Islam, it doesn’t even
mention Arabs. It is the Jews and the
religion of the Jews that have “persecuted the
church of God and wasted it” (Galatians 1:13-14).
“Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For
they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:” – Romans 9:6.
“I know that ye
are Abraham's seed; but ye seek to kill me, because
my word hath no place in you.” – John 8:37.
There is
also this: what disturbs most Christians I have spoken to about this subject is
the claimed extant value of the Book of Mormon.
Certain words date it, like “Bible”:
"The word Bible itself is simply a
transliteration of the Greek word bíblos (βίβλος), meaning "book." So
the Bible is, quite simply, The Book." . . .
"It is interesting that the Bible never refers to
itself as "the Bible." So when did people start calling these sacred
writings by the word Bible? Again, the Bible is not really a book, but a
collection of books. Yet, even the New Testament writers seemed to understand
that the things being written about Jesus were to be considered part of
Scripture." – Biblestudy tools.com
Biblio/Biblos
= “The Book”. The LDS claims that their
“Book of Mormon” actually predates the Bible, which is ridiculous, otherwise, the
plagiarism of Isaiah, and the mention of “Bible” as the scriptures (while
denouncing it as incomplete) would not appear in the Nephi story.
The earliest
use of the word "Bible" to describe the combined scriptures is around
4th century or 388 CE. (Source, Wikipedia on Bible Entymology).
“Bible” comes from the Greek "Biblio" and/or the Latin Biblia
meaning "The Book” or "Books".
The “Book of
Mormon”, and indeed the mention in “Nephi 29:3-6” of “Bible” according to the
Mormons, was supposed to be an ancient book that an angel named “Moroni” gave
to Joseph Smith to translate which were on “gold plates”.
What became
the “Holy Bible” was, before the Aleppo Codex, a collection of scriptures from
the prophets, handed down the tribes of Israel.
The use of the word “Bible” as the compiled collection today does not
predate Moroni. As a matter of fact, the
Moroni story claims the same timing as “earliest use of the word Bible” for the
scriptures.
If we
consider what "The Books" actually are:
"And
I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened:
and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the
dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books,
according to their works." - Revelation 20:12.
These
“books” are within us. Just as David
describes in Psalm 139:14-16.
Moroni, Mormon, Men
Earlier in
my struggle with this organization, it was explained to me that the name “Mormon” meant “more good”. It was Egyptian in origin according to the
Joseph Smith histories on where the word came from (see Name
Origin).
I had done
my own etymological search on “mor + mon”.
“mor”:
mor "great" – first found here, then on “more”
- Etymonline.com.
“mon:
from Latin mons (plural montes)
"mountain" (from PIE root *men- (2)
"to project")” – Etymonline.com.
So I went to “men” (man).
“men:
Proto-Indo-European root meaning "to think,"
with derivatives referring to qualities and states of mind or thought. It is the hypothetical source of/evidence for
its existence is provided by: Sanskrit manas- "mind,
spirit," matih "thought,"” - Etymonline.com.
So “mor +
mon” would mean something akin to “great + mountain” or “great + men/mind”.
“great men”
scripturally reminded me of Genesis
6:2-5 and Revelation
18:23.
There are
also “great men” who were of the
prophets of the Bible and strong houses of Israel. How do we know which? By their fruits. In 2
Peter 2:1-4 and Jude
1:3-5. “bringing in damnable heresies”, “who were before of old, ordained to this condemnation”,
“False prophets”, “false teachers” who “crept in unawares”. Why does Jesus and Paul still bring up “Egypt”
centuries after that exodus?
Because most
are still in bondage to it. Some
religions are based on, and whose goals are to pull them back into bondage: Acts
7:6, and Galatians:
“And
that because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in
privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that
they might bring us into bondage:” – Galatians
2:4.
And Galatians
4:24-26 gender to “bondage” which the Jerusalem that now is, is
under with her children – And there is that word “gender” again.
Everything
that has happened, IS happening and WILL happen is about "The Word": What it is, what happened
to it within us, and how God restores it through Christ.
There are no
ceremonies, no rituals, no race of people and no "religion" that
corners the market on this. It's not
about religion. And any religious
organization claiming that a "prophet" brought or wrote, "the
restored Gospel" is not about Christ; but about their religion or the
power they covet through it and for it.
Period.
The Mormon
church is exactly what Christ tells us not to be: they are secretive, they use
ritual, “secret passwords”, they are prideful, they lie and flatter: the organization
is wealthy: they take from the people and gather unto themselves. They are exactly what Egypt was, before the
400 years of hard bondage in Moses’ time.
They promote
the Jewish fables and the law over teachings of Christ. They align with the Jews, as promoted in that
Nephi 29 chapter over Christ to the point that they baptize their people in a “sea”
sitting atop twelve sculptures of oxen.
That is Solomon’s
temple (1
Kings 7:25), not Christ’s! Romans
1:25, Psalm
106:19-20. We know what
happened to Solomon’s Temple (1
Kings 11:3-5; 2
Kings 25:9)!
In this narration
(biblical
narrative), it highlights several scriptures in the Bible
concerning the building, the corrupting and the destruction of the Temple of
Solomon:
“Hamath”
(a city in Syria. Hamas? 1
Kings 8:65, 2
Chronicles 7:8). Such a
dirty word in today’s current events.
“Aram-Damascus”
– (2
Kings 16:6-8) This is where Rezin of Syria recovered Elath to Syria
and drove out the Jews; where the first mention of the word “Jew” as an
identity appears in the Bible.
“Sennecherib”
– (2
Kings 18:15-16) the “Cherub” that “sinned” (Ezekiel
28:16) . Pay attention to this.
“You will know them by their fruits”.
Construction
Of Solomon’s Temple
Ziv – Link leads to “Iyar” (which I
thought was Lyar until I saw it in a different font). Solomon began building
the temple in the eighth month of the civil year and second month of the
Ecclesiastical year. That would be today October (civil) or March/April
(spiritual calendar).
Bul – Temple is completed, ironically the
opposite of Ziv (is the eighth month civil, and second month spiritual calendar
month), which today is called “Cheshvan/Marcheshvan”. The month of “Bul” after a seven year project
to completion: See Daniel chapter four concerning Nebuchadnezzar’s “seven times”
living as the beast, as an “ox eating grass” (Psalm
106:19-20). These two terms
appear in 1
Kings 6:37-38.
Reminder: (John
2:21 and 1 Corinthians 6:19); Jesus revealed “the temple of his body”. Paul revealed our bodies “are the temples of the Holy Ghost”, which we
have of God. To continue:
Tyrians – The Tyrians were the one’s who
actually built the temple, according to the plan God sent David for Solomon to
build. But Solomon didn’t labor, the Tyrians did the actual labor.
Solomon
hired Hiram (King
Hiram) of Tyre/Tyrus, Lebanon to oversee the labor. He is described as “a
skilled craftsman” a “stone
mason”.
The king of
Tyre is also mentioned in Ezekiel 28, in context:
“Thou
art the anointed cherub that
covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou
hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire.” – Ezekiel
28:12-15.
And in
Isaiah:
“Thy
pomp is brought down to the
grave, and the noise of thy viols: the worm is spread under thee, and the worms
cover thee. How art thou fallen from
heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground,
which didst weaken the nations!
” – Isaiah
14:8-15.
You see
where the Lord is taking us in this?
That isn’t
all: In that same paragraph on the “construction”
of the temple: it also mentioned in relation to Hiram that the “Stonemasons”
(which they capitalize) were from Gebal (Byblos in parenthesis). Byblos is linked, but Gebal is not. These cut
the stones of the temple.
Gebal is
mentioned in two verses in the Old Testament: Psalm
83:7 and Ezekiel
27:9. I posted the links in
context of the verses mentioning Tyre/Tyrus and the merchants that traded in
gold, silver, brass, persons of men and vessels. (Selling the souls of men, Revelation
18:11-13).
Byblos does
not appear in the Bible itself; however Gobel and Gebal does. The etymology also leads to the word “Bible”, meaning “The Book”.
"The
English word "Bible", therefore, ultimately derives from the Greek
name of the city, Βύβλος ('Βύblos / Byblos'), a Greek mumbo-jumble of גְּבָל ('Gāḇal / Gəbal Gobâl'..., that is, 'Gebal' or 'Jebel'), which
shares the same root as גְּבוּל ('Gəḇūl / Gābūl, that is 'Gebul' or 'Jabul'), as they're
derivatives of ג־ב־ל ('g-ḇ-l' / 'g-b-l' / 'g-v-l'), which means 'twist as a rope',
'(be a, set) border' or 'bound(aria)'"
– Source, Byblos
etymology.
“twist as a
rope” – DNA (Gabal, Cabal, Cabbala): His
substance David talks about being “made” in Psalm
139:14-16.
You have
Judah, the lawgiver who “built Elath in 2
Kings 14:21-24 and “restored it to
Judah”. Two chapters later in
2
Kings 16:6 you have Judah at war with Israel and Syria; as King Rezin
of Syria is driving the Jews (first mention of them in the Bible) from “Elath”
and “recovered Elath to Syria” where “they remain unto this day”. (See Isaiah
17:3).
The Jews
come back down into the remnant of Judah, when they learn that King
Nebuchadnezzar spared a remnant of them.
Why? Because Judah is the
lawgiver. So who were the Jews before
they were Judah?
Remember,
Sennecherib, Eliakim and his discussion with Rabshakeh over the “Syrian language” over the “language of the Jews” (2
Kings 18:26) happened after the fall of Solomon.
Where do the
Mormons fit in here?
So “mor + mon” would
mean something akin to “great + mountain” or “great + men/mind”.
“great men”
scripturally reminded me of Genesis
6:2-5 and Revelation
18:23.
They are
tied to the very “stonemasons” from “Tyre”; the “craftsmen” Hiram and their “traditions”
of re-arranging the structure (letters) of the temple.
Jesus “Knew letters” (John
7:15): the Jews in the Synagogue were shocked, because he wasn’t one
of them: he was never taught the letters of the language within us.
Jesus was “God in the flesh” (1
Tim. 3:16). He not only knew
what was written in us, he know what was written in THEM.
The Mormon
religion was “constructed” after the death of William Morgan:
a “Freemason” who went rogue and was planning to expose them.
William
Morgan’s widow,
Lucinda Pendelton Morgan somehow ended up being Joseph’s
Smith’s third “plural wife” a year after the Freemasons went quiet
and the “Mormon” religion was conceived (within months of each event). There
have been some additions to the section on Lucinda since I looked at it ten
years ago, that now shed doubt, but she was sealed to him.
The “Endowment
Ceremony”, which my husband was being groomed for, is a renovation of the
Freemason degree ceremony, admitted by the fellow who was helping my husband
prepare for it.
I suffered
many things trying to expose this religion and it’s ties the to false Jews
deception of the beast they will call “Messiah”. Most of those things exposed were removed by
Google when they cut off my account and blog.
I still have them and have reposted many concerning the LDS here
at the bottom of the article with summary.
I know the
things God revealed to me, and what I'm supposed to share about them. I don't belong to a religious organization
because all the various houses of religion that I have visited have revealed to
me that in some degree, they have laid claim on the ownership of God. And I will not entertain these vanities in
religions any longer.
We are
called to “earnestly contend for the faith”
(Jude
1:3), not a “religion”.
We are
called to “have no fellowship with the works of
darkness, but reprove them” (Ephesians
5:11-12). I would rather
that feelings be hurt, and not souls in the speaking of the truth.
There is
movement in the tunnels of the deception.
Oh, and one more thing:
On the construction
section of the article on Solomon’s temple, it refers to the event
in 1
Kings 9:12-14, citing:
“After the Temple and palace
(taking an additional 13 years) is completed, Solomon hands
over twenty cities in the northwestern Galilee near Tyre as
a repayment to Hiram.[24] Hiram
was not pleased with the gift, however, and asks "what are these towns
that you have given me, my brother?". Hiram then calls them "the land
of Cabul (Kabul)"
Cabul/Cabal – And Hiram sent King Solomon “threescore talents of gold”. That is “six hundred and six” talents less than Solomon received in taxes in a year. 1 Kings 10:14 & Revelation 13:18.
Pride, religion, elitism, working in the dark against your fellow man while claiming piety: Read it again. Is it really worth it?
"Many
will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name?
and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful
works? And then will I profess unto
them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity."
- Matthew 7:22-23.